2017

Linear Sieve

This section mainly focuses on the linear sieve and its various applications in competitive programming, including a brief introduction on how to pick out primes and a way to calculate multiple values of multiplicative functions.

Sieve of Eratosthenes

While this name may sound scary, the sieve of Eratosthenes is probably the simplest way to pick out all the primes in a given range from \( 1 \) to \( n \). As we already know, one of the properties that all primes have is that they do not have any factors except 1 and themselves. Therefore, if we cross out all composites, which have at least one factor, we can obtain all primes. The following code demonstrates a simple implementation of the said algorithm:

As we can see, the statement is_composite[i * j] = true; crosses out all numbers that do have a factor, as they are all composites. All remaining numbers, therefore, should be prime. We then check for those primes and put them into a container named `prime`.

Linear Sieve

It can be analyzed that the method above runs in \( O(n \log n) \) complexity (with the Euler-Mascheroni constant, i.e. \( \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\sum^{n}_{i=1}\frac{1}{n}=\ln n+\gamma \)). Let us take a minute to consider the bottleneck of such sieve. While we do need to cross out each composite once, in practice we run the inner loop for a composite multiple times due to the fact that it has multiple factors. Thus, if we can establish a unique representation for each composite and pick them out only once, our algorithm will be somewhat better. Actually it is possible to do so. Note that every composite \( q \) must have at least one prime factor, so we can pick the smallest prime factor \( p \), and let the rest of the part be \( i \), i.e. \( q=ip \). Since \( p \) is the smallest prime factor, we have \( i \geq p \), and no prime less than \( p \) can divide \( i \). Now let us take a look at the code we have a moment ago. When we loop for every \( i \), all primes not exceeding \( i \) is already recorded in the container `prime`. Therefore, if we only loop for all elements in `prime` in the inner loop, breaking out when the element divides \( i \), we can pick out each composite exactly once.

As is shown in the code, the statement if (i % prime[j] == 0) break; terminates the loop when \( p \) divides \( i \). From the analysis above, we can see that the inner loop is executed only once for each composite. Hence, the code above performs in \( O(n) \) complexity, resulting in its name - the 'linear' sieve.

Multiplicative Function

There is one specific kind of function that shows importance in the study of number theory - the multiplicative function. By definition, A function \( f(x) \) defined on all positive integers is multiplicative if it satisfies the following condition:

For every co-prime pair of integers \( p \) and \( q \), \( f(pq)=f(p)f(q) \).

Applying the definition, it can be shown that \( f(n)=f(n)f(1) \). Thus, unless for every integer \( n \) we have \( f(n)=0 \), \( f(1) \) must be \( 1 \). Moreover, two multiplicative functions \( f(n) \) and \( g(n) \) are identical if and only if for every prime \( p \) and non-negative integer \( k \), \( f(p^k)=g(p^k) \) holds true. It can then be implied that for a multiplicative function \( f(n) \), it will suffice to know about its representation in \( f(p^k) \).

The following functions are some commonly used multiplicative functions, according to Wikipedia:

• The constant function \( I(p^k)=1 \).
• The power function \( Id_a(p^k)=p^{ak} \), where \( a \) is constant.
• The unit function \( \epsilon(p^k)=[p^k=1] \) (\( [P] \) is \( 1 \) when \( P \) is true, and \( 0 \) otherwise).
• The divisor function \( \sigma_a(p^k)=\sum_{i=0}^kp^{ai} \), denoting the sum of the \( a \)-th powers of all the positive divisors of the number.
• The Mobius function \( \mu(p^k)=[k=0]-[k=1] \).
• The Euler's totient function \( \phi(p^k)=p^k-p^{k-1} \).

It is interesting that the linear sieve can also be used to find out all the values of a multiplicative function \( f(x) \) in a given range \( [1,n] \). To do so, we have take a closer look in the code of the linear sieve. As we can see, every integer \( x \) will be picked out only once, and we must know one of the following property:

1. \( x \) is prime. In this case, we can determine the value of \( f(x) \) directly.
2. \( x=ip \) and \( p \) does not divide \( i \). In this case, we know that \( f(x)=f(i)f(p) \). Since both \( f(i) \) and \( f(p) \) are already known before, we can simply multiply them together.
3. \( x=ip \) and \( p \) divides \( i \). This is a more complicated case where we have to figure out a relationship between \( f(i) \) and \( f(ip) \). Fortunately, in most situations, a simple relationship between them exists. For example, in the Euler's totient function, we can easily infer that \( \phi(ip)=p\phi(i) \).

Since we can compute the function value of \( x \) satisfying any of the above properties, we can simply modify the linear sieve to find out all values of the multiplicative function from \( 1 \) to \( n \). The following code implements an example on the Euler's totient function.

Extension on the Linear Sieve

Well, it might not always be possible to find out a formula when \( p \) divides \( i \). For instance, I can write some random multiplicative function \( f(p^k)=k \) which is difficult to infer a formula with. However, there is still a way to apply the linear sieve on such function. We can maintain a counter array \( cnt[i] \) denoting the power of the smallest prime factor of \( i \), and find a formula using the array since \( f(ip)=f(\frac{i}{p^{cnt[i]}})f(p^{cnt[i]+1}) \). The following code gives an example on the function I've just written.